Medium Format Family

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

HClenses which are the best

fotonick66

New Member
Hi everybody,
I'm a new H1/phase one P25 user and i'm really happy with it. At the moment I have the 50-110mm, which is most on the camera (little heavy but great lens) and the HC 35mm: great as wide-angle. Which one could be now the next lens: I think the fast 100/2.2 for portraits and situation where i need short DOF (I used a lot the 110/2 FE...), and then a longer tele. The 210? Or the 300? Or the 150 with 1.7 converter?
Thanks a lot for your suggestions. Best regards from Switzerland. Nick
 

mark1958

New Member
>[HI Nicola. My first two lenses were the 50-110 >and 35mm as well. I am using an H2 with leaf >aptus 65. Since then, I have used a number of >the HC lenses and will summarize my own >experiences. THe 100/2.2 is an outstanding >optic. It is very fast and can give very nice >bokeh. The images are very sharp with good >microcontrast. I have heard wonderful things >about the 110/2 FE especially as it relates to >bokeh. I am not sure the HC lenses will give >the same results as I have not seen a direct >comparison. I did compare my canon 85mm 1.2 >lens on a 1Dsmk2 with the hassy H2 100/2.2 and >thought the bokeh and the apparent DOF were both >very good. They were slightly different but not >sure I can say one was better than the other. I >would say it is a matter of personal taste. The >210mm is also an outstanding lens. I have >compared center sharpness with the 210 and 210 >plus 1.7x and cannot see any real degradation in >image quality with the converter. I also have >compared the 100+1.7x with the 150mm. The >100/1.7 combo gives equally good images when >compared to the 150mm. In addition, I did not >find the bokeh from the 150mm to be any better >so I sold my 150mm lens. I have not tried the >300mm lens so I have no comment. The other lens >that I really like is the 120mm macro. In terms >of image quality shooting at 5 feet or less, >there is nothing in the HC lineup that can beat >it. The 120mm did not perform as well as the >100mm at distances greater than 5 to 6 feet so >that is something to keep in mind. THe other >point i can make is that with extension tubes, I >have gotten beautiful macro images even with the >50-110mm zoom. I do have to admit that the >50-110 zoom is the best zoom lens I have ever >used. In terms of sharpness, it is almost if >not equally as good as the primes I have >compared at the same focal lengths. The issue >as you state is that it is big and heavy and >slower than the primes. However, when hiking >and doing landscapes, this lens was used 90% of >the time while the 35mm was used the other 8 to >10%. So for me sometimes all i take is the 35mm >and the zoom if I am trying to conserve on space >and weight. Good luck. Hope this was helpful ]
 

fotografz

Active Member
Hi Guys, there is a special promotion for H/C lenses @ approx. a 35% discount !!!! It's on the Hasselblad site and you have to register your H camera to get the coupon. Limited time, so hurry !!!

I just ordered the 28mm.

The only lens not included is the 300/4 (which, BTW, its the premier lens of the lot, and still quite excellent with the 1.7X converter).

My personal favorite is the 100/2.2 because I shoot weddings with it on a H3D/39.
 
Top